FHA – Confusion and a 50% increase in downpayment requirements?

by Tom on October 8, 2009
in Market Musings, banks

HousingWire has an article about the proposed legislation and what it might mean for FHA borrowers.   Let me attempt to clear a few things up:

  • It used to be that when calculating the FHA maximum loan amount, some of the closing costs were factored in to the “acquisition cost.”   So, if you were buying a house for $100,000, the down payment calculations would have been based on an acquisition cost of $101,500.    That went away already, at least a year ago, though I don’t recall the exact date it disappeared.
  • The only closing costs that are allowed to be financed at this point is the Upfront Mortgage Insurance Premium.   Here’s an example of how that works:   If you are buying a house for $100,000, your base loan amount would formerly be $96,500 (3.5% down).   Then the Upfront mortgage insurance premium would be added back to your loan and you’d end up with a loan amount of approximately $98,200 (financing a 1.75% MIP fee).    That puts your effective equity position at less than 2%.
  • Your cash needed would be a 3.5% down payment ($3500) and let’s just estimate $3,000 for closing costs and prepaids, so you’d have $6,500 you’d have to come up with.

Under the new proposed legislation, here’s what I expect would happen:

  • You purchase a house for $100,000, your minimum down payment would be 5%.   That would put your base loan amount at $95,000.   
  • The new rules wouldn’t allow any closing costs, fees or any such things to be financed, so your final loan amount would be $95,000.
  • Your cash needed would be the 5% downpayment ($5,000), $3,000 for closing costs and prepaids (estimate), plus an additional $1750 (also estimated) for the up front mortgage insurance premium.
  • That would bring your cash to close to approximately $9750.   
  • That’s about a 50% increase in down payment and cash to close requirements.

Now a couple of thoughts about the entire process:

  • What I’ve read of the proposed legislation doesn’t specifically address the up front mortgage insurance but it seems like a total elimination of financed charges of any sort is in the “cards.”
  • Studies have shown that there is a direct correlation between downpayments and the likelihood of default.
  • FHA is running out of money.   
  • So we’ve got to expect that there will be tightening of the regulations and underwriting requirements.
  • The legislation is “proposed.”   That means it’s not passed yet.

Hope that helps clear up a little of the confusion.

I’ll have more about it as time marches on.   In the mean time, if I can be of help, give me a call at (616) 292-7559 or e-mail me at tvanderwell@straighttalkaboutmortgages.com.

Tom Vanderwell

FHA Confusion Surrounds Mortgage Finance Regulation Change : HousingWire || financial news for the mortgage market

As new housing finance regulations take effect and even more are set for the beginning of 2010, a number of questions have arisen on the impact to Federal Housing Administration (FHA)-insured loans.

A bill that calls for an increase to the down payment requirement for FHA loans from 3.5% to 5% would also prohibit borrowers from including closing costs in the principal of the mortgage.

But, is this provision actually a practice already in place?

Many originators have told HousingWire they’ve operated for the last year under a directive from the Department and Housing and Urban Development (HUD) prohibiting the practice.

Technorati Tags:

Random Posts

    Share Your Thoughts